Research study Program year 2024 Source: CMS Open Payments

Ph2b Type 2 Diabetes

Research payments

$600,981

42 payments

Through program year 2024, $600,981 in research payments was reported against Ph2b Type 2 Diabetes, across 42 payments, paid by Amgen Inc..

Paid by
Amgen Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2024 Research $600,981 42

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2024
  1. Amgen Inc. $600,981 42 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2024
  1. Conquest Research - Winter Park Organisation paid for research $74,276 2 payments
  2. Dm Clinical Research - Martin Diagnostic Clinic Organisation paid for research $40,837 2 payments
  3. Cedar Crosse Research And Health Care Organisation paid for research $36,874 2 payments
  4. New Horizon Research Center Organisation paid for research $36,376 2 payments
  5. Be Well Clinical Studies Organisation paid for research $33,397 2 payments
  6. Florida Institute For Clinical Research Organisation paid for research $32,990 2 payments
  7. Dm Clinical Research - Cyfair Clinical Research Center Organisation paid for research $30,379 2 payments
  8. Physicians East Organisation paid for research $29,763 2 payments
  9. Dm Clinical - Detroit Organisation paid for research $29,288 2 payments
  10. Diabetes And Endocrinology Associates Of Stark County INC Organisation paid for research $28,944 2 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record