Research study Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

PH II Placebo Controlled of Mtig7192a and Atezo in Nsclc

Research payments

$1,690,000

315 payments

Through program year 2020, $1,690,000 in research payments was reported against PH II Placebo Controlled of Mtig7192a and Atezo in Nsclc, across 315 payments.

Paid by (largest first)
Genentech, Inc.; F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 Research $574,830 126
2019 Research $1,115,170 189

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Genentech, Inc. $1,689,705 313 payments
  2. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG $295 2 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Sarah Cannon Research Organisation paid for research $591,378 96 payments
  2. US Oncology Research, Inc. Organisation paid for research $253,117 41 payments
  3. Sarah Cannon Research Institute LLC Organisation paid for research $244,038 22 payments
  4. Virginia Cancer Specialists Organisation paid for research $102,609 2 payments
  5. US Oncology Research LLC Organisation paid for research $92,288 23 payments
  6. Arizona Oncology Organisation paid for research $88,407 4 payments
  7. Karmanos Cancer Hospital Teaching hospital · MI $87,425 72 payments
  8. Sarah Cannon Researchinstitute LLC Organisation paid for research $53,041 5 payments
  9. Kumc Research Institute INC Organisation paid for research $52,559 20 payments
  10. Oncology/Hematology Associates Organisation paid for research $48,681 14 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record