Research study Program year 2023 Source: CMS Open Payments

Patient Retrospective Outcomes Study

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01550575

Research payments

$1,668,977

280 payments

Through program year 2023, $1,668,977 in research payments was reported against Patient Retrospective Outcomes Study, across 280 payments, paid by Boston Scientific Corporation.

Paid by
Boston Scientific Corporation
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT01550575

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2023 Research $285,099 81
2022 Research $812,370 110
2021 Research $41,609 15
2020 Research $529,899 74

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2020–2023
  1. Boston Scientific Corporation $1,668,977 280 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2020–2023
  1. Vitamed Research LLC Organisation paid for research $463,355 27 payments
  2. Toledo Clinic Organisation paid for research $158,750 27 payments
  3. Axis Spine Pllc Organisation paid for research $125,769 9 payments
  4. Richard Ferro Interventional Pain Medicine · Lansing, MI $113,861 21 payments
  5. Biomedical Research Alliance Of New York Organisation paid for research $94,118 22 payments
  6. West Florida Specialty Physicians LLC Organisation paid for research $83,750 8 payments
  7. Forest Health Medical Center Organisation paid for research $61,000 10 payments
  8. Florida Pain Clinic INC Organisation paid for research $49,357 8 payments
  9. Lakeside Orthopedic Institute Organisation paid for research $49,078 2 payments
  10. Uh Cleveland Medical Center Teaching hospital · OH $40,146 13 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

8 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2023

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record