Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Nrich

Research payments

$492,780

13,008 payments

Through program year 2025, $492,780 in research payments was reported against Nrich, across 13,008 payments, paid by NotalVision.

Paid by
NotalVision
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $492,780 13,008

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2025
  1. NotalVision $492,780 13,008 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2025
  1. Virginia Eye Institute Organisation paid for research $56,790 1,531 payments
  2. Carolina Eyecare Physicians, LLC Organisation paid for research $29,790 810 payments
  3. Total Practice Management, LLC Organisation paid for research $24,900 692 payments
  4. Elman Retina Group P. A. Organisation paid for research $22,740 507 payments
  5. Lange Eye Care Organisation paid for research $22,560 592 payments
  6. Piedmont Retina Specialists, PA Organisation paid for research $20,640 556 payments
  7. Graystone Ophthalmology Associates, PA Organisation paid for research $19,290 492 payments
  8. Mali Enterprises Global, LLC Organisation paid for research $14,430 343 payments
  9. Eye Care Partners Organisation paid for research $14,160 379 payments
  10. Sophia El Hamichi Retina Specialist · Fort Myers, FL $13,770 348 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record