Research study Program year 2024 Source: CMS Open Payments

Nintedanib in PF-ILD (extension)

Research payments

$103,785

1,235 payments

Through program year 2024, $103,785 in research payments was reported against Nintedanib in PF-ILD (extension), across 1,235 payments.

Paid by (largest first)
Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH; Boehringer Ingelheim Limited; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2024 Research $7,197 2
2021 Research $16,883 377
2020 Research $34,851 539
2019 Research $44,854 317

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH $50,306 854 payments
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim Limited $46,283 379 payments
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $7,197 2 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2024
  1. University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Organisation paid for research $4,947 1 payment
  2. Mayo Clinic Organisation paid for research $4,681 37 payments
  3. UT Medicine General Surgery Marc Organisation paid for research $3,575 30 payments
  4. Yale University School Of Medicine Organisation paid for research $3,294 37 payments
  5. Inova Fairfax Medcl Campus Organisation paid for research $2,998 29 payments
  6. Duke Univ Medcl Ctr Organisation paid for research $2,970 30 payments
  7. The Oregon Clnc Organisation paid for research $2,871 40 payments
  8. University Of Kansas Medical Center Organisation paid for research $2,821 43 payments
  9. Emory University Hospital Teaching hospital · GA $2,806 34 payments
  10. University Of Alabama At Birmingham Organisation paid for research $2,707 43 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record