Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Mytactic Targeting Actionable Mutation Study in Cancer US Piia Multicenter Nonrandomized Open LBL

Research payments

$10,597,284

1,661 payments

Through program year 2025, $10,597,284 in research payments was reported against Mytactic Targeting Actionable Mutation Study in Cancer US Piia Multicenter Nonrandomized Open LBL, across 1,661 payments.

Paid by (largest first)
Genentech, Inc.; F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $9,034 2
2024 Research $678,225 313
2023 Research $3,633,927 632
2022 Research $4,302,996 472
2021 Research $1,973,102 242

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Genentech, Inc. $10,564,838 1,651 payments
  2. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG $32,447 10 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Oneoncology Research Network L Organisation paid for research $2,018,284 321 payments
  2. Sarah Cannon Research Organisation paid for research $1,736,240 141 payments
  3. Sarah Cannon Research Institute LLC Organisation paid for research $1,108,790 307 payments
  4. Northwest Medical Specialties Pllc Organisation paid for research $894,958 32 payments
  5. Oneoncology Research Network LLC Organisation paid for research $887,822 258 payments
  6. Western Institutional Review Board Organisation paid for research $619,228 69 payments
  7. Sarah Cannon Research Institute Organisation paid for research $549,137 35 payments
  8. St Vincent Healthcare Teaching hospital · MT $353,485 45 payments
  9. Kfh - Antioch Teaching hospital · CA $232,725 21 payments
  10. St. Lukes Regional Medical Center Teaching hospital · ID $232,429 33 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

9 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record