Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Multicenter, Randomized, Double-masked, Parallel Group Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of iDose TR (travoprost intracameral implant) in Conjunction with Cataract Surgery vs. Cataract Surgery Alone

Research payments

$590,773

49 payments

Through program year 2025, $590,773 in research payments was reported against Multicenter, Randomized, Double-masked, Parallel Group Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of iDose TR (travoprost intracameral implant) in Conjunction with Cataract Surgery vs. Cataract Surgery Alone, across 49 payments, paid by Glaukos Corporation.

Paid by
Glaukos Corporation
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $590,773 49

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2025
  1. Glaukos Corporation $590,773 49 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2025
  1. Trinity Research Group Organisation paid for research $382,663 7 payments
  2. Vance Thompson Vision Clinic, Prof LLC Organisation paid for research $80,425 9 payments
  3. Eye Center of Racine & Kenosha Organisation paid for research $43,720 6 payments
  4. HEA Clinic Organisation paid for research $39,920 6 payments
  5. Arizona Advanced Eye Research Institute LLC Organisation paid for research $30,048 6 payments
  6. Southeast Texas Eye Specialists, PLLC Organisation paid for research $5,060 2 payments
  7. Commercial Print Management Organisation paid for research $3,792 9 payments
  8. Southern Intellectual Properties, Inc. Organisation paid for research $1,940 1 payment
  9. Ophthalmology Consultants, Ltd Organisation paid for research $1,500 1 payment
  10. The Regional Eye Center, PC Organisation paid for research $1,500 1 payment

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

9 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record