Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

M21-341 - A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Oral Armour Thyroid Compared to Synthetic T4 for the Treatment of Primary Hypothyroidism in Adult Participants

Research payments

$4,187,486

379 payments

Through program year 2025, $4,187,486 in research payments was reported against M21-341 - A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Oral Armour Thyroid Compared to Synthetic T4 for the Treatment of Primary Hypothyroidism in Adult Participants, across 379 payments, paid by AbbVie, Inc..

Paid by
AbbVie, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $4,187,486 379

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $4,187,486 379 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2025
  1. Lucas Research INC Organisation paid for research $280,913 4 payments
  2. Accellacare US INC Organisation paid for research $214,663 11 payments
  3. East Coast Institute For Research Organisation paid for research $180,458 15 payments
  4. Texas Diabetes & Endocrinology Pa Organisation paid for research $145,485 5 payments
  5. Alsa Research LLC Organisation paid for research $117,357 7 payments
  6. Ivy-Joan Madu Organisation paid for research $88,408 2 payments
  7. Diabetes And Endocrinology Associat Organisation paid for research $86,686 10 payments
  8. Palm Research Center INC Organisation paid for research $80,774 2 payments
  9. Jacksonville Ctr For Clinical Rsrch Organisation paid for research $76,876 3 payments
  10. West Orange Endocrinology PA Organisation paid for research $75,934 2 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record