Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

M20-350 - Study to Evaluate Adverse Events and Change in Disease Activity in Adult and Adolescent Participants With Acute Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection on Treatment With Oral Tablets of Glecaprevir (GLE) Pibrentasvir (PIB)

Research payments

$38,831

5 payments

Through program year 2025, $38,831 in research payments was reported against M20-350 - Study to Evaluate Adverse Events and Change in Disease Activity in Adult and Adolescent Participants With Acute Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection on Treatment With Oral Tablets of Glecaprevir (GLE) Pibrentasvir (PIB), across 5 payments, paid by AbbVie, Inc..

Paid by
AbbVie, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $38,831 5

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $38,831 5 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2025
  1. Emory University Hospital Teaching hospital · GA $12,350 1 payment
  2. Thomas Jefferson University Organisation paid for research $11,105 1 payment
  3. The Johns Hopkins University Organisation paid for research $8,337 1 payment
  4. University of Louisville Research Foundation Organisation paid for research $3,939 1 payment
  5. Orlando Immunology Center PA Organisation paid for research $3,100 1 payment

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

5 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record