Research study Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

M16-904

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03695237

Research payments

$1,307,020

300 payments

Through program year 2020, $1,307,020 in research payments was reported against M16-904, across 300 payments, paid by AbbVie, Inc..

Paid by
AbbVie, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03695237

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 Research $781,661 208
2019 Research $525,359 92

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,307,020 300 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Alfred I Dupont Hosp For Children Teaching hospital · DE $254,047 35 payments
  2. Regents Of The University Of California Organisation paid for research $205,207 23 payments
  3. University of Minnesota Regents Organisation paid for research $73,194 18 payments
  4. Tacoma General Allenmore Hospital Teaching hospital · WA $72,946 22 payments
  5. Rocky Mountain Diabetes Center Organisation paid for research $66,792 9 payments
  6. Deaconess Medical Center Teaching hospital · WA $66,271 17 payments
  7. Board Of Regents Of The University Of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Organisation paid for research $58,988 18 payments
  8. Childrens Mercy Hospital Teaching hospital · MO $54,647 11 payments
  9. Pediatric Endocrine Associates PC Organisation paid for research $51,018 39 payments
  10. Francisco Nieves-Rivera MD Organisation paid for research $46,374 21 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record