Research study Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

M16-085

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03567616

Research payments

$409,872

50 payments

Through program year 2020, $409,872 in research payments was reported against M16-085, across 50 payments, paid by AbbVie, Inc..

Paid by
AbbVie, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03567616

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 Research $108,819 23
2019 Research $301,054 27

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $409,872 50 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Duke University Organisation paid for research $233,098 21 payments
  2. University Of Kansas Medical Center Research Institute INC Organisation paid for research $72,791 15 payments
  3. Washington University in St Louis Organisation paid for research $39,972 4 payments
  4. Ohio State University Organisation paid for research $34,890 4 payments
  5. Kingsley, Jeffrey Organisation paid for research $11,500 1 payment
  6. Aurora Research Institute Organisation paid for research $11,500 1 payment
  7. Kingsley Jeffrey Organisation paid for research $6,121 4 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

6 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record