Research study Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

M16-045

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03569293

Research payments

$6,962,255

1,245 payments

Through program year 2020, $6,962,255 in research payments was reported against M16-045, across 1,245 payments, paid by AbbVie, Inc..

Paid by
AbbVie, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03569293

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 Research $3,101,624 709
2019 Research $3,860,631 536

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $6,962,255 1,245 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Mount Sinai School Of Medicine Organisation paid for research $671,240 20 payments
  2. Probity Med Research Corporation Organisation paid for research $394,060 61 payments
  3. Oregon Medical Research Center Organisation paid for research $334,224 45 payments
  4. Uc Davis Medical Center Teaching hospital · CA $296,557 20 payments
  5. Dermatology Clinical Trials Organisation paid for research $268,367 28 payments
  6. Ricardo Antonio Tan MD INC Organisation paid for research $245,337 22 payments
  7. Clinical Research Puerto Rico Organisation paid for research $223,537 33 payments
  8. Alliance Dermatology & Mohs Center, Pc Organisation paid for research $215,861 14 payments
  9. Menter Dermatology Research Institute Organisation paid for research $211,678 28 payments
  10. Howland Allergy And Asthma Pllc Organisation paid for research $199,911 22 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record