Research study Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

M16-043

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03069352

Research payments

$1,002,948

122 payments

Through program year 2020, $1,002,948 in research payments was reported against M16-043, across 122 payments, paid by AbbVie, Inc..

Paid by
AbbVie, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03069352

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 Research $475,533 51
2019 Research $527,415 71

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,002,948 122 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Norton Healthcare INC Organisation paid for research $224,659 42 payments
  2. Harry Erba Medical Oncology · Ann Arbor, MI $161,582 4 payments
  3. Yi Bin Chen Hematology & Oncology · Boston, MA $152,616 13 payments
  4. Hetty Carraway Hematology & Oncology · Chagrin Falls, OH $148,967 11 payments
  5. Upmc Hillman Cancer Center Organisation paid for research $120,939 21 payments
  6. Mark Sloan Emergency Medicine · Lexington, KY $116,969 11 payments
  7. Ut Md Anderson Cancer Center Teaching hospital · TX $31,959 7 payments
  8. Joshua Zeidner Hematology & Oncology · Chapel Hill, NC $25,560 4 payments
  9. Gunderson Lutheran Med Foundation Organisation paid for research $9,159 2 payments
  10. Anca Askanase Rheumatology · New York, NY $4,000 1 payment

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

7 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record