Research study Program year 2022 Source: CMS Open Payments

Lucentis Dosing Retreatment

Research payments

$36,736

10 payments

Through program year 2022, $36,736 in research payments was reported against Lucentis Dosing Retreatment, across 10 payments, paid by F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG.

Paid by
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2022 Research $10,895 4
2021 Research $25,841 6

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2021–2022
  1. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG $36,736 10 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2021–2022
  1. Srinivas Sadda Ophthalmology · Pasadena, CA $11,951 2 payments
  2. David Lally Ophthalmology · Springfield, MA $6,681 1 payment
  3. David Sarraf Ophthalmology · Los Angeles, CA $4,889 1 payment
  4. Nancy Holekamp Ophthalmology · Chesterfield, MO $4,889 1 payment
  5. Glenn Yiu Retina Specialist · Sacramento, CA $2,946 1 payment
  6. Marco Zarbin Ophthalmology · Newark, NJ $1,548 1 payment
  7. Veeral Sheth Ophthalmology · Oak Forest, IL $1,543 1 payment
  8. Jesse Jung Ophthalmology · Oakland, CA $1,145 1 payment
  9. Kenneth Freund Ophthalmology · New York, NY $1,145 1 payment

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2022

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record