Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Ic-8 Apthera Iol New Enrollment Post Approval Study

Research payments

$79,200

29 payments

Through program year 2025, $79,200 in research payments was reported against Ic-8 Apthera Iol New Enrollment Post Approval Study, across 29 payments, paid by Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc..

Paid by
Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $47,290 13
2024 Research $31,910 16

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2024–2025
  1. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $79,200 29 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2024–2025
  1. Vukich Enterprises Organisation paid for research $40,600 11 payments
  2. Argus Research Center Organisation paid for research $16,795 7 payments
  3. Oakland Ophthalmic Surgery Organisation paid for research $7,630 2 payments
  4. Price Vision Group Organisation paid for research $4,675 3 payments
  5. Vance Thompson Ophthalmology · Sioux Falls, SD $4,500 1 payment
  6. Vance Thompson Vision Clinic, Prof LLC Organisation paid for research $2,000 2 payments
  7. Northern New Jersey Eye Institute Organisation paid for research $1,000 1 payment
  8. Feinerman Vision Center Organisation paid for research $1,000 1 payment
  9. Prem S.Virdi MD Pc Organisation paid for research $1,000 1 payment

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

8 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record