Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Hypotension Prediction Index Study (HPI Study)

Research payments

$2,311,819

68 payments

Through program year 2025, $2,311,819 in research payments was reported against Hypotension Prediction Index Study (HPI Study), across 68 payments.

Paid by (largest first)
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation; Becton, Dickinson and Company
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $95,284 1
2022 Research $250 1
2021 Research $213,524 16
2020 Research $2,002,762 50

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation $2,216,536 67 payments
  2. Becton, Dickinson and Company $95,284 1 payment
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Univ Of Mi Hospitals & Hlth Ctrs Teaching hospital · MI $399,581 7 payments
  2. Cleveland Clinic Educational Foundation Organisation paid for research $363,167 2 payments
  3. The Massachusetts General Hospital Organisation paid for research $281,622 5 payments
  4. Oregon Health & Science University Heart Valve Clinic Organisation paid for research $258,168 4 payments
  5. The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Organisation paid for research $177,335 12 payments
  6. Hospital Of The Univ Of Penna Teaching hospital · PA $133,711 2 payments
  7. University Of Washington Med Ctr Teaching hospital · WA $132,207 4 payments
  8. Henry Ford Hospital Teaching hospital · MI $118,725 4 payments
  9. Regents Of The University Of Colorado Organisation paid for research $107,810 1 payment
  10. Yale University School Of Medicine Organisation paid for research $102,872 11 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

9 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record