Research study Program year 2021 Source: CMS Open Payments

GrafixPL PRIME Evaluation

Research payments

$135,752

16 payments

Through program year 2021, $135,752 in research payments was reported against GrafixPL PRIME Evaluation, across 16 payments.

Paid by (largest first)
Smith+Nephew, Inc.; Osiris Therapeutics Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2021 Research $4,620 2
2020 Research $18,483 4
2019 Research $112,649 10

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. Smith+Nephew, Inc. $82,622 12 payments
  2. Osiris Therapeutics Inc. $53,130 4 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. Ut Southwestern Medical Center Organisation paid for research $80,399 5 payments
  2. Center For Clinical Research, Inc. Organisation paid for research $17,913 3 payments
  3. Eric Johnson Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine · Bozeman, MT $15,000 1 payment
  4. Matthew Regulski Podiatrist, Foot & Ankle Surgery · Toms River, NJ $9,750 1 payment
  5. University Of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Organisation paid for research $4,620 2 payments
  6. 5M Consulting LLC Organisation paid for research $3,750 1 payment
  7. Charles Ananian Podiatrist · Los Angeles, CA $2,250 1 payment
  8. Stuart Adams OD PC Organisation paid for research $2,070 2 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

4 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record