Research study Program year 2024 Source: CMS Open Payments

Fen PH II RMS

Research payments

$413,687

67 payments

Through program year 2024, $413,687 in research payments was reported against Fen PH II RMS, across 67 payments.

Paid by (largest first)
Hoffmann-La Roche Limited; F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2024 Research $90,558 20
2023 Research $138,107 27
2022 Research $185,022 20

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2022–2024
  1. Hoffmann-La Roche Limited $393,977 53 payments
  2. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG $19,710 14 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2022–2024
  1. Sharlin Health And Neurology LLC Organisation paid for research $116,518 6 payments
  2. Jack Florin Neurology · Fullerton, CA $92,772 12 payments
  3. Cleveland Clinic Hospital Teaching hospital · OH $87,711 11 payments
  4. Sharlin Health And Neurology L Organisation paid for research $35,355 3 payments
  5. Pacific Clinical Research Mana Organisation paid for research $23,919 6 payments
  6. Consultants In Neurology Organisation paid for research $18,963 5 payments
  7. Clinical Trial Network Organisation paid for research $16,361 5 payments
  8. Columbus Neuroscience LLC Organisation paid for research $12,863 4 payments
  9. Amit Bar-Or Neurology · Philadelphia, PA $4,387 7 payments
  10. Claire Riley Neurology · New York, NY $1,980 3 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

5 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record