Research study Program year 2022 Source: CMS Open Payments

FebriDx

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02018198

Research payments

$729,099

58 payments

Through program year 2022, $729,099 in research payments was reported against FebriDx, across 58 payments, paid by Rapid Pathogen Screening, Inc..

Paid by
Rapid Pathogen Screening, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02018198

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2022 Research $1,109 1
2020 Research $639,709 49
2019 Research $88,280 8

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. Rapid Pathogen Screening, Inc. $729,099 58 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Teaching hospital · MA $177,590 3 payments
  2. New York-Presbyterian/Brooklyn Metho Teaching hospital · NY $59,890 7 payments
  3. Clinical Research Associates Organisation paid for research $59,720 4 payments
  4. Brigham And Womens Hospital Teaching hospital · MA $50,150 1 payment
  5. Massachusetts General Hospital Teaching hospital · MA $47,250 4 payments
  6. AFC Urgent Care/Greenville Organisation paid for research $40,800 1 payment
  7. University Of Wi Hospitals & Clinics Teaching hospital · WI $38,670 4 payments
  8. Vanderbilt University Medical Center Teaching hospital · TN $33,393 2 payments
  9. Medical College Of Wisconsin Organisation paid for research $30,687 2 payments
  10. Lsb Research Group LLC Organisation paid for research $30,155 3 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2022

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record