Research study Program year 2023 Source: CMS Open Payments

Emphysema Progression Biomarker Study

Research payments

$969,788

452 payments

Through program year 2023, $969,788 in research payments was reported against Emphysema Progression Biomarker Study, across 452 payments.

Paid by (largest first)
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co.KG
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2023 Research $25,633 2
2022 Research $16,804 3
2021 Research $371,461 92
2020 Research $213,720 174
2019 Research $342,168 181

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $937,284 81 payments
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co.KG $32,503 371 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2023
  1. Los Angeles Biomedical Research Organisation paid for research $167,171 6 payments
  2. The Regents of The University of California Organisation paid for research $115,604 9 payments
  3. University Of Iowa Hosp & Clinics Teaching hospital · IA $105,072 24 payments
  4. Baylor College Of Medicine Organisation paid for research $91,982 28 payments
  5. Johns Hopkins University Organisation paid for research $67,287 34 payments
  6. Lung Diagnostic Organisation paid for research $47,996 4 payments
  7. John Hopkins University Organisation paid for research $46,768 1 payment
  8. Regents Of The University Of California Organisation paid for research $46,370 17 payments
  9. Brigham And Womens Hospital Teaching hospital · MA $34,903 27 payments
  10. National Jewish Health Teaching hospital · CO $30,773 18 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2023

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record