Research study Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

Ds8201-A-U301

Research payments

$873,410

265 payments

Through program year 2020, $873,410 in research payments was reported against Ds8201-A-U301, across 265 payments, paid by Daiichi Sankyo Inc..

Paid by
Daiichi Sankyo Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 Research $873,410 265

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2020
  1. Daiichi Sankyo Inc. $873,410 265 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2020
  1. Dana Farber Partners Cancer Care INC Organisation paid for research $220,111 6 payments
  2. Sarah Cannon Research Institute, LLC Organisation paid for research $100,758 48 payments
  3. Saint Lukes Hospital Of Kansas City Teaching hospital · MO $78,556 18 payments
  4. Precision Cancer Research LLC Organisation paid for research $60,954 16 payments
  5. Medstar Research Institute Organisation paid for research $57,294 15 payments
  6. Piedmont Cancer Institute Atlanta Organisation paid for research $38,962 7 payments
  7. Norton Healthcare, Inc. Dba Norton Healthcare Research Organisation paid for research $38,003 19 payments
  8. The Methodist Hospital Research Institute Organisation paid for research $27,009 2 payments
  9. Sharp Memorial Hospital Organisation paid for research $24,995 16 payments
  10. Washington University School Of Medicine Organisation paid for research $21,743 5 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record