Research study Program year 2022 Source: CMS Open Payments

Covid BioSpec

Research payments

$1,438,426

34 payments

Through program year 2022, $1,438,426 in research payments was reported against Covid BioSpec, across 34 payments.

Paid by (largest first)
Becton, Dickinson and Company; Davol Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2022 Research $263,479 8
2021 Research $1,174,946 26

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2021–2022
  1. Becton, Dickinson and Company $1,437,926 33 payments
  2. Davol Inc. $500 1 payment
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2021–2022
  1. Fellows Research Alliance, INC Organisation paid for research $344,466 4 payments
  2. Ctmd Research Organisation paid for research $310,074 4 payments
  3. Invesclinic US LLC Organisation paid for research $222,076 4 payments
  4. Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast INC Organisation paid for research $188,624 3 payments
  5. Fellows Research Alliance Organisation paid for research $111,176 4 payments
  6. Planned Parenthood Of Southern Organisation paid for research $93,156 1 payment
  7. Louisiana State University Organisation paid for research $53,408 2 payments
  8. Memorial Sloan Ketterling Cancer Ct Organisation paid for research $51,373 1 payment
  9. Eastern Carolina Womens Center PA Organisation paid for research $29,515 1 payment
  10. University Of Alabama Hospital Teaching hospital · AL $13,420 2 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

9 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2022

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record