Research study Program year 2021 Source: CMS Open Payments

CIP333 Acetaminophen

Research payments

$869,041

44 payments

Through program year 2021, $869,041 in research payments was reported against CIP333 Acetaminophen, across 44 payments.

Paid by (largest first)
Medtronic MiniMed, Inc.; Medtronic, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2021 Research $118,614 5
2020 Research $750,428 39

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2020–2021
  1. Medtronic MiniMed, Inc. $750,428 39 payments
  2. Medtronic, Inc. $118,614 5 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2020–2021
  1. Amcr Institute Organisation paid for research $204,355 6 payments
  2. Diablo Clinical Research Organisation paid for research $171,842 7 payments
  3. William Sansum Diabetes Center Organisation paid for research $163,654 6 payments
  4. Rainier Clinical Research Center Organisation paid for research $131,243 9 payments
  5. The Univ. Of Colorado Organisation paid for research $96,063 6 payments
  6. Atlanta Diabetes Associates Organisation paid for research $76,547 8 payments
  7. U Of Co Denverbarbara Davis Center Childhood Diab Organisation paid for research $22,039 1 payment
  8. Rainier Crc, Llc Dba: Rainier Clinical Research Cent Organisation paid for research $3,300 1 payment

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

6 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record