Research study Program year 2021 Source: CMS Open Payments

CIP330 Synergy

Research payments

$3,743,224

139 payments

Through program year 2021, $3,743,224 in research payments was reported against CIP330 Synergy, across 139 payments.

Paid by (largest first)
Medtronic MiniMed, Inc.; Medtronic, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2021 Research $300,542 43
2020 Research $3,442,682 96

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2020–2021
  1. Medtronic MiniMed, Inc. $3,442,682 96 payments
  2. Medtronic, Inc. $300,542 43 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2020–2021
  1. Diablo Clinical Research Organisation paid for research $532,465 15 payments
  2. Rainier Crc, Llc Dba: Rainier Clinical Research Cent Organisation paid for research $490,687 11 payments
  3. William Sansum Diabetes Center Organisation paid for research $482,713 8 payments
  4. Texas Diabetes & Endocrinology Pa Organisation paid for research $471,965 24 payments
  5. Regents Of University Of Colorado Organisation paid for research $430,587 12 payments
  6. Rocky Mountain Clinical Research, Llc Organisation paid for research $342,544 7 payments
  7. Atlanta Diabetes Associates Organisation paid for research $339,888 12 payments
  8. Amcr Institute Organisation paid for research $330,736 10 payments
  9. Kevin Kaiserman Pediatric Endocrinology · West Covina, CA $133,166 12 payments
  10. University of South Florida Organisation paid for research $83,796 10 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record