Research study Program year 2021 Source: CMS Open Payments

Cep298 Ewis

Research payments

$2,645,406

281 payments

Through program year 2021, $2,645,406 in research payments was reported against Cep298 Ewis, across 281 payments.

Paid by (largest first)
Medtronic MiniMed, Inc.; Medtronic, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2021 Research $977,841 57
2020 Research $1,652,248 221
2019 Research $15,318 3

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. Medtronic MiniMed, Inc. $1,667,566 224 payments
  2. Medtronic, Inc. $977,841 57 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2021
  1. Rainier Clinical Research Center Organisation paid for research $323,940 13 payments
  2. Medical Investigations INC Organisation paid for research $301,374 18 payments
  3. Atlanta Diabetes Associates Organisation paid for research $272,147 18 payments
  4. Grunberger Diabetes Medical Center Pc Organisation paid for research $176,296 17 payments
  5. Metabolic Research Institute Inc Organisation paid for research $173,150 20 payments
  6. Amcr Institute Organisation paid for research $160,385 15 payments
  7. Iowa Diabetes & Endocrinology Organisation paid for research $160,279 20 payments
  8. The Univ. Of Colorado Organisation paid for research $141,174 15 payments
  9. Mayo Clinic Rochester Family Clinics Organisation paid for research $111,409 13 payments
  10. Stanford University Organisation paid for research $81,703 15 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record