Research study Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

Braf in Adjuvant

Research payments

$367,017

44 payments

Through program year 2020, $367,017 in research payments was reported against Braf in Adjuvant, across 44 payments, paid by Genentech, Inc..

Paid by
Genentech, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 Research $1,606 2
2019 Research $365,411 42

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Genentech, Inc. $367,017 44 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Washington University At St Louis Organisation paid for research $76,945 3 payments
  2. Sarah Cannon Research Institute LLC Organisation paid for research $75,528 11 payments
  3. Acorn Research LLC Organisation paid for research $29,430 2 payments
  4. Regents Of The University Of Colorado Organisation paid for research $26,217 1 payment
  5. University Of Alabama Hospital Teaching hospital · AL $21,643 3 payments
  6. Kfh - Los Angeles Teaching hospital · CA $21,368 1 payment
  7. Overlook Medical Center Teaching hospital · NJ $21,191 1 payment
  8. West Cancer Center Organisation paid for research $14,022 1 payment
  9. Advocate Lutheran General Hospital Teaching hospital · IL $13,432 1 payment
  10. Duke University Clinical Research Institute Organisation paid for research $9,892 2 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record