Research study Program year 2019 Source: CMS Open Payments

Birmingham Hip Resurfacing System BHR Post Approval Study US

Research payments

$61,528

36 payments

Through program year 2019, $61,528 in research payments was reported against Birmingham Hip Resurfacing System BHR Post Approval Study US, across 36 payments, paid by Smith+Nephew, Inc..

Paid by
Smith+Nephew, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2019 Research $61,528 36

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2019
  1. Smith+Nephew, Inc. $61,528 36 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2019
  1. Strong Memorial Hospital Teaching hospital · NY $19,888 5 payments
  2. Hospital For Special Surgery Teaching hospital · NY $18,815 4 payments
  3. Imperial Health Center For Orthopaedics Organisation paid for research $8,510 5 payments
  4. Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute Organisation paid for research $5,195 7 payments
  5. OrthoCarolina Organisation paid for research $4,632 9 payments
  6. Tucson Orthopaedic Institute Organisation paid for research $2,260 2 payments
  7. Aurora Medical Center Organisation paid for research $1,500 1 payment
  8. Aurora Advanced Orthopaedics Organisation paid for research $540 2 payments
  9. OrthoCarolina Research Institute Inc Organisation paid for research $188 1 payment

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

7 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2019

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record