Research study Program year 2021 Source: CMS Open Payments

Bioequivalence study

Research payments

$359,787

27 payments

Through program year 2021, $359,787 in research payments was reported against Bioequivalence study, across 27 payments, paid by Perrigo Company plc.

Paid by
Perrigo Company plc
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2021 Research $359,787 27

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2021
  1. Perrigo Company plc $359,787 27 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2021
  1. Clayton Eye Clinical Research, LLC Organisation paid for research $115,875 5 payments
  2. Total Eye Care, PA Organisation paid for research $74,750 3 payments
  3. APF Research, LLC Organisation paid for research $71,150 4 payments
  4. Central Florida Eye Associates Organisation paid for research $49,800 2 payments
  5. Eye Research Foundation, Inc. Organisation paid for research $21,500 2 payments
  6. Ophthalmology Associates Organisation paid for research $11,500 4 payments
  7. Recipient not identified in the record $5,220 2 payments
  8. AdvanceMed Clinical Research Organisation paid for research $4,500 1 payment
  9. Lakeside Vision Center Organisation paid for research $2,500 1 payment
  10. Mark J. Weiss, M.D., Inc. Organisation paid for research $2,500 1 payment

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

9 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record