Research study Program year 2023 Source: CMS Open Payments

BI 425809 Pivotal efficacy study 1

Research payments

$1,241,138

74 payments

Through program year 2023, $1,241,138 in research payments was reported against BI 425809 Pivotal efficacy study 1, across 74 payments.

Paid by (largest first)
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2023 Research $576,855 29
2022 Research $576,682 36
2021 Research $87,601 9

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2021–2023
  1. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,180,394 49 payments
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim RCV GmbH & Co KG $60,744 25 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2021–2023
  1. San Marcus Research Clinic INC Organisation paid for research $199,213 10 payments
  2. Neuro Behavioral Clinical Organisation paid for research $139,320 3 payments
  3. Artemis Institute For Clinical Research Organisation paid for research $124,580 6 payments
  4. Elias Research Associates LLC Organisation paid for research $124,204 2 payments
  5. North Texas Clinical Trials LLC Organisation paid for research $116,186 2 payments
  6. Elias Research Associates Organisation paid for research $112,903 1 payment
  7. Omega Clinical Trials Organisation paid for research $104,313 5 payments
  8. Velocity Clinical Research Westlake Organisation paid for research $86,284 1 payment
  9. Insite Clinical Research Organisation paid for research $62,899 6 payments
  10. Artemis Headlands LLC Organisation paid for research $33,728 3 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

9 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2023

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record