Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

Baguera-C Ide

Research payments

$1,021,603

117 payments

Through program year 2025, $1,021,603 in research payments was reported against Baguera-C Ide, across 117 payments, paid by Spineart SA.

Paid by
Spineart SA
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $1,021,603 117

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2025
  1. Spineart SA $1,021,603 117 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2025
  1. Foundation For Spinal Restoration Organisation paid for research $148,158 4 payments
  2. Sparta Spine LLC Organisation paid for research $102,781 8 payments
  3. Restorative Spinal Research Institute LLC Organisation paid for research $102,370 11 payments
  4. Spine Institute Of Louisiana Foundation Organisation paid for research $100,780 13 payments
  5. Indiana Spine Group Organisation paid for research $71,644 9 payments
  6. Oregon Spine Care Organisation paid for research $66,723 14 payments
  7. The Regents Of The University Of California Irvine Organisation paid for research $55,607 4 payments
  8. Georgetown University Clinical Trials Organisation paid for research $53,897 3 payments
  9. Clinical Events Committee Organisation paid for research $52,052 12 payments
  10. Carolina Neurosurgery And Spine Organisation paid for research $41,144 3 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record