Research study Program year 2022 Source: CMS Open Payments

Amplatzer Amulet LAAO vs. NOAC (CATALYST)

Research payments

$1,485,383

456 payments

Through program year 2022, $1,485,383 in research payments was reported against Amplatzer Amulet LAAO vs. NOAC (CATALYST), across 456 payments, paid by Abbott Laboratories.

Paid by
Abbott Laboratories
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2022 Research $1,485,383 456

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2022
  1. Abbott Laboratories $1,485,383 456 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2022
  1. Nair Research LLC Organisation paid for research $235,631 9 payments
  2. Western Institutional Review Board, Inc. (WIRB) Organisation paid for research $87,270 93 payments
  3. Vanderbilt University Medical Center Teaching hospital · TN $79,902 7 payments
  4. West Houston Area Clinical Trial Consultants, LLC Organisation paid for research $78,405 4 payments
  5. Hightower Clinical Organisation paid for research $56,233 4 payments
  6. Sarah Cannon Research Institute LLC Organisation paid for research $50,716 9 payments
  7. Baylor Research Institute Organisation paid for research $48,489 18 payments
  8. Methodist Hospital Research Institute Organisation paid for research $36,914 5 payments
  9. Regents Of The University Of California At San Diego Organisation paid for research $31,180 2 payments
  10. Piedmont Heart Institute INC Organisation paid for research $30,351 4 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2022

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record