Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

AETOS Shoulder System Post Market

Research payments

$643,690

105 payments

Through program year 2025, $643,690 in research payments was reported against AETOS Shoulder System Post Market, across 105 payments, paid by Smith+Nephew, Inc..

Paid by
Smith+Nephew, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $332,136 64
2024 Research $306,631 38
2023 Research $4,923 3

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. Smith+Nephew, Inc. $643,690 105 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. Western Orthopaedics Organisation paid for research $132,130 20 payments
  2. California Pacific Orthopaedics Research & Education Foundation Organisation paid for research $131,305 12 payments
  3. Rothman Institute Orthopeadics Organisation paid for research $111,359 24 payments
  4. Neuromusculoskeletal Center of the Cascades PC Organisation paid for research $95,185 18 payments
  5. Duke University Organisation paid for research $72,787 14 payments
  6. Mississippi Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center PLLC Organisation paid for research $46,520 6 payments
  7. The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York Organisation paid for research $19,275 2 payments
  8. Scripps Mercy Hospital Teaching hospital · CA $17,876 2 payments
  9. Hughston Foundation Organisation paid for research $14,804 5 payments
  10. Holy Cross Hospital Teaching hospital · FL $2,447 2 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

7 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record