Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

A22-301

Research payments

$3,978,800

249 payments

Through program year 2025, $3,978,800 in research payments was reported against A22-301, across 249 payments, paid by PharmaEssentia USA Corporation.

Paid by
PharmaEssentia USA Corporation
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $3,617,364 235
2023 Research $361,436 14

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. PharmaEssentia USA Corporation $3,978,800 249 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2023–2025
  1. University Of North Carolina At Chapel Hill Organisation paid for research $595,947 19 payments
  2. Fort Wayne Medical Oncology And Hematology INC Organisation paid for research $325,886 8 payments
  3. Marin Cancer Care Organisation paid for research $263,524 11 payments
  4. University Of Virginia Medical Cente Teaching hospital · VA $250,375 6 payments
  5. Ut Md Anderson Cancer Center Teaching hospital · TX $249,566 7 payments
  6. U Of U Hospitals & Clinics Teaching hospital · UT $220,662 9 payments
  7. Duke University Organisation paid for research $210,615 13 payments
  8. University Of Washington Med Ctr Teaching hospital · WA $202,507 10 payments
  9. Keck School Of Medicine Of Usc Organisation paid for research $197,042 20 payments
  10. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. Organisation paid for research $187,224 5 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record