Research study Program year 2022 Source: CMS Open Payments

A Study of Rucaparib Versus Physician's Choice of Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer and Homologous Recombination Gene Deficiency (TRITON3)

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02975934

Research payments

$5,612,343

917 payments

Through program year 2022, $5,612,343 in research payments was reported against A Study of Rucaparib Versus Physician's Choice of Therapy in Patients With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer and Homologous Recombination Gene Deficiency (TRITON3), across 917 payments, paid by Clovis Oncology, Inc..

Paid by
Clovis Oncology, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT02975934

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2022 Research $805,179 119
2021 Research $1,194,021 249
2020 Research $2,006,188 313
2019 Research $1,606,955 236

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. Clovis Oncology, Inc. $5,612,343 917 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. Urology Associates Pc Organisation paid for research $644,201 23 payments
  2. Mayo Clinic Hospital Teaching hospital · AZ $626,819 50 payments
  3. Sharp Memorial Hospital Organisation paid for research $459,035 62 payments
  4. Strong Memorial Hospital Teaching hospital · NY $334,023 22 payments
  5. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Organisation paid for research $283,266 28 payments
  6. Regents Of The University Of Minnesota Organisation paid for research $226,429 21 payments
  7. Langley Porter Psychiatric Hospital Teaching hospital · CA $221,212 17 payments
  8. Urology Of Virginia Pllc Organisation paid for research $190,723 31 payments
  9. University Of Washington Med Ctr Teaching hospital · WA $184,478 27 payments
  10. University Of North Carolina At Chapel Organisation paid for research $158,764 50 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

9 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2022

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record