Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study of Abemaciclib Combined With Standard Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Versus Standard Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Alone in Patients With High Risk, Node Positive, Early Stage, Hormone Receptor Positive, Human Epidermal Receptor 2 Negative, Breast Cancer

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03155997

Research payments

$28,831,140

1,927 payments

Through program year 2025, $28,831,140 in research payments was reported against A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study of Abemaciclib Combined With Standard Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Versus Standard Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Alone in Patients With High Risk, Node Positive, Early Stage, Hormone Receptor Positive, Human Epidermal Receptor 2 Negative, Breast Cancer, across 1,927 payments.

Paid by (largest first)
Eli Lilly and Company; Eli Lilly Export S.A. Puerto Rico Branch
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03155997

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $789,401 157
2024 Research $1,334,388 226
2023 Research $186 1
2022 Research $1,358,646 234
2021 Research $3,222,168 364
2020 Research $7,537,423 410
2019 Research $14,588,928 535

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $28,740,156 1,918 payments
  2. Eli Lilly Export S.A. Puerto Rico Branch $90,984 9 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. US Oncology Research LLC Organisation paid for research $6,377,275 205 payments
  2. Texas Oncology PA Organisation paid for research $2,471,232 166 payments
  3. Sarah Cannon Research Institute LLC Organisation paid for research $1,568,979 54 payments
  4. Florida Cancer Specialists Organisation paid for research $918,780 28 payments
  5. Ohsu Hospital And Clinics Teaching hospital · OR $744,724 19 payments
  6. Fairfax-Northern Virginia Organisation paid for research $577,682 13 payments
  7. Cleveland Clinic Hospital Teaching hospital · OH $562,182 17 payments
  8. Dana Farber Partners Cancer Care INC Organisation paid for research $512,575 16 payments
  9. Cancer Center Of Kansas PA Organisation paid for research $442,460 6 payments
  10. Mayo Clinic Organisation paid for research $437,877 9 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record