Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

A Randomized, Open Label Phase 2/3 Study Comparing Cobolimab + Dostarl

Research payments

$2,483,935

1,009 payments

Through program year 2025, $2,483,935 in research payments was reported against A Randomized, Open Label Phase 2/3 Study Comparing Cobolimab + Dostarl, across 1,009 payments, paid by GlaxoSmithKline, LLC..

Paid by
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $244,143 157
2024 Research $482,985 295
2023 Research $756,227 268
2022 Research $681,965 175
2021 Research $318,614 114

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $2,483,935 1,009 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Bioclinica INC Organisation paid for research $341,190 65 payments
  2. NYU School of Medicine Organisation paid for research $322,483 117 payments
  3. Compassionate Care Research Group INC Organisation paid for research $197,149 119 payments
  4. Institute For Clinical Research INC Organisation paid for research $188,260 39 payments
  5. St Elizabeth Healthcare Organisation paid for research $115,498 75 payments
  6. Hematology Oncology Associates Of Fredericksburg Organisation paid for research $104,708 84 payments
  7. Univ Of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Organisation paid for research $98,989 38 payments
  8. Biomedical Research Alliance Organisation paid for research $96,989 47 payments
  9. University Of Pittsburgh Organisation paid for research $77,796 19 payments
  10. Biomedical Research Alliance Of New York LLC Organisation paid for research $60,271 52 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

7 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record