Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Lebrikizumab Compared to Placebo in Participants 6 Months to <18 Years of Age With Moderate-To-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05559359

Research payments

$1,423,050

108 payments

Through program year 2025, $1,423,050 in research payments was reported against A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Lebrikizumab Compared to Placebo in Participants 6 Months to <18 Years of Age With Moderate-To-Severe Atopic Dermatitis, across 108 payments, paid by Eli Lilly and Company.

Paid by
Eli Lilly and Company
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT05559359

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $380,203 32
2024 Research $992,444 48
2023 Research $12,500 1
2022 Research $37,903 27

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $1,423,050 108 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Dermatology Research Associates INC Organisation paid for research $210,033 5 payments
  2. Texas Dermatology And Laser Specialists Organisation paid for research $163,398 5 payments
  3. Osman Dermatology Organisation paid for research $144,564 5 payments
  4. Medical University of South Carolina Organisation paid for research $110,574 4 payments
  5. Allergy And Asthma Specialists Psc Organisation paid for research $109,239 5 payments
  6. Medical College Of Wisconsin INC Organisation paid for research $92,467 5 payments
  7. Clinical Research Ctr Of Alabama, LLC Organisation paid for research $69,693 3 payments
  8. Treasure Valley Medical Research Organisation paid for research $61,155 4 payments
  9. Arkansas Research Trials LLC Organisation paid for research $58,742 5 payments
  10. Solutions Through Advanced Research Organisation paid for research $44,128 3 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record