Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

a randomised,open label,phase III study of saruparib AZD5305 plus camizestrant compared with physicians choice CDK4 6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy or plus camizestrant for the first line treatment of patients with BRCA1,BRCA2,or PALB2 mutations and hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative IHC 0,1+,2+ISH non-amplified advanced breast cancer evoPAR breast01

Research payments

$1,346,386

35 payments

Through program year 2025, $1,346,386 in research payments was reported against a randomised,open label,phase III study of saruparib AZD5305 plus camizestrant compared with physicians choice CDK4 6 inhibitor plus endocrine therapy or plus camizestrant for the first line treatment of patients with BRCA1,BRCA2,or PALB2 mutations and hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative IHC 0,1+,2+ISH non-amplified advanced breast cancer evoPAR breast01, across 35 payments.

Paid by (largest first)
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP; AstraZeneca UK Limited
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $1,243,535 31
2024 Research $102,851 4

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2024–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,293,835 33 payments
  2. AstraZeneca UK Limited $52,551 2 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2024–2025
  1. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Organisation paid for research $162,703 1 payment
  2. Dana Farber Partners Cancer Care Organisation paid for research $155,321 1 payment
  3. New York University Organisation paid for research $120,777 1 payment
  4. Hospital Of The Univ Of Penna Teaching hospital · PA $73,707 1 payment
  5. Memorial Regional Hospital Teaching hospital · FL $72,781 1 payment
  6. Memorial Health Services Organisation paid for research $58,371 1 payment
  7. Profound Research LLC Organisation paid for research $57,250 4 payments
  8. Northwestern University Organisation paid for research $49,540 1 payment
  9. West Virginia University School Of Medicine Organisation paid for research $44,700 1 payment
  10. Mercy Research Organisation paid for research $43,875 1 payment

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record