Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

a phase III,two arm,parallel,randomized,multi center,open label,global study to determine the efficacy of volrustomig,plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for first line treatment of patients with metastatic non small cell lung cancer

Research payments

$3,851,981

64 payments

Through program year 2025, $3,851,981 in research payments was reported against a phase III,two arm,parallel,randomized,multi center,open label,global study to determine the efficacy of volrustomig,plus chemotherapy versus pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for first line treatment of patients with metastatic non small cell lung cancer, across 64 payments.

Paid by (largest first)
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP; AstraZeneca UK Limited
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $3,851,981 64

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $3,682,546 54 payments
  2. AstraZeneca UK Limited $169,435 10 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2025
  1. Exigent Research Organisation paid for research $684,995 4 payments
  2. Fairfax Northern Virginia Organisation paid for research $459,376 1 payment
  3. Nho Revive Research Institute, LLC Organisation paid for research $414,521 1 payment
  4. Sarah Cannon Research Institute LLC Organisation paid for research $346,639 10 payments
  5. Sarah Cannon Research Institute Organisation paid for research $327,933 10 payments
  6. Ohio State University Research Compliance Organisation paid for research $186,233 1 payment
  7. Millennium Research & Clinical Development, LLC Organisation paid for research $176,075 1 payment
  8. Henry Ford Hospital Teaching hospital · MI $170,318 1 payment
  9. Upmc Hillman Cancer Center Organisation paid for research $105,737 1 payment
  10. Gi Reviewers LLC Organisation paid for research $102,410 5 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record