Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

A Phase I/II, Randomized, Open-Label Platform Study Utilizing A Master

Research payments

$3,907,748

435 payments

Through program year 2025, $3,907,748 in research payments was reported against A Phase I/II, Randomized, Open-Label Platform Study Utilizing A Master, across 435 payments, paid by GlaxoSmithKline, LLC..

Paid by
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $284,550 95
2024 Research $843,889 60
2023 Research $1,163,684 115
2022 Research $981,805 93
2021 Research $600,130 62
2020 Research $33,689 10

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $3,907,748 435 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Dana Farber Partners Cancer Care INC Organisation paid for research $1,196,545 51 payments
  2. University Of Wisconsin Organisation paid for research $972,393 44 payments
  3. Emory University Organisation paid for research $849,205 155 payments
  4. University Of Wisconsin And Visual Sciences Organisation paid for research $305,449 44 payments
  5. Dana Farber Partners Cancer Organisation paid for research $195,610 31 payments
  6. Multiple Doctors Organisation paid for research $113,181 39 payments
  7. Dana Farber Cancer Institute INC Organisation paid for research $109,483 9 payments
  8. Indiana University Organisation paid for research $106,546 39 payments
  9. University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Organisation paid for research $23,810 9 payments
  10. Rush University Medical Center Organisation paid for research $22,870 4 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

5 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record