Research study Program year 2021 Source: CMS Open Payments

A Phase 4 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix for the Management of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associated with Uterine Fibroids in Premenopausal Women

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03886220

Research payments

$742,596

220 payments

Through program year 2021, $742,596 in research payments was reported against A Phase 4 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix for the Management of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associated with Uterine Fibroids in Premenopausal Women, across 220 payments, paid by AbbVie, Inc..

Paid by
AbbVie, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03886220

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2021 Research $742,596 220

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2021
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $742,596 220 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2021
  1. Gcp Clinical Research LLC Organisation paid for research $136,562 8 payments
  2. Masters Of Clinical Research Inc Organisation paid for research $55,080 10 payments
  3. Alliance For Multispecialty Research Organisation paid for research $43,130 11 payments
  4. Clinical Trials Of Texas INC Organisation paid for research $37,437 13 payments
  5. Genoma Research Group INC Organisation paid for research $36,325 6 payments
  6. Medisense INC Organisation paid for research $34,924 7 payments
  7. Southern Clinical Research Associate Organisation paid for research $34,299 7 payments
  8. Georgia Research For Women Organisation paid for research $30,375 6 payments
  9. Midtown Obgyn Organisation paid for research $28,903 8 payments
  10. Advances In Health INC Organisation paid for research $27,971 14 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record