Who Paid My Doc Search
Menu
Research study Program year 2022 Source: CMS Open Payments

A Phase 4, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel Group Study Comparing Improvements in Lung Function in Adults With Severe to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Suboptimal Inspiratory Flow Rate Following Once-Daily Treatment Over 12 Weeks With Either Revefenacin Inhalation Solution Delivered via Standard Jet Nebulizer or Tiotropium Delivered via a Dry Powder Inhaler (Spiriva HandiHaler)

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05165485

Research payments

$2,595,231

296 payments

Through program year 2022, $2,595,231 in research payments was reported against A Phase 4, Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Parallel Group Study Comparing Improvements in Lung Function in Adults With Severe to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Suboptimal Inspiratory Flow Rate Following Once-Daily Treatment Over 12 Weeks With Either Revefenacin Inhalation Solution Delivered via Standard Jet Nebulizer or Tiotropium Delivered via a Dry Powder Inhaler (Spiriva HandiHaler), across 296 payments, paid by Mylan Specialty L.P..

Paid by
Mylan Specialty L.P.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT05165485

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2022 Research $2,595,231 296

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2022
  1. Mylan Specialty L.P. $2,595,231 296 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2022
  1. Velocity Clinical Research, Inc. Organisation paid for research $637,775 59 payments
  2. Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc. Organisation paid for research $377,469 23 payments
  3. Midwest Chest Consultants, P.C. Organisation paid for research $150,697 12 payments
  4. Florida Institute For Clinical Research, LLC Organisation paid for research $118,032 13 payments
  5. Remington-Davis, Inc. Organisation paid for research $108,347 11 payments
  6. Sarasota Clinical Research Organisation paid for research $101,514 12 payments
  7. Sierra Clinical Research Organisation paid for research $98,322 10 payments
  8. North Carolina Clinical Research Organisation paid for research $97,601 12 payments
  9. Sherman Clinical Research Organisation paid for research $88,664 11 payments
  10. Clinical Site Partners, LLC Organisation paid for research $75,419 11 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Records

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2022

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record