Research study Program year 2021 Source: CMS Open Payments

A Phase 3b Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety of Elagolix in Combination with Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate for the Management of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associated with Uterine Fibroids in Premenopausal Women

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03271489

Research payments

$1,826,838

985 payments

Through program year 2021, $1,826,838 in research payments was reported against A Phase 3b Study to Evaluate the Long-Term Safety of Elagolix in Combination with Estradiol/Norethindrone Acetate for the Management of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associated with Uterine Fibroids in Premenopausal Women, across 985 payments, paid by AbbVie, Inc..

Paid by
AbbVie, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03271489

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2021 Research $1,826,838 985

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2021
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,826,838 985 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2021
  1. Genesis Clinical Research Organisation paid for research $156,791 26 payments
  2. Dct Genesis LLC Organisation paid for research $111,914 54 payments
  3. Medisense INC Organisation paid for research $77,734 11 payments
  4. Advances In Health INC Organisation paid for research $73,680 23 payments
  5. Columbia University Med Center Organisation paid for research $57,630 24 payments
  6. Houston Center For Clinical Research Organisation paid for research $52,730 11 payments
  7. Hackensack University Medical Center Teaching hospital · NJ $51,719 16 payments
  8. FMC Science LLC Organisation paid for research $50,213 30 payments
  9. MD Strategies Research Centers Organisation paid for research $49,937 18 payments
  10. Gcp Clinical Research LLC Organisation paid for research $48,801 12 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record