Who Paid My Doc Search
Menu
Research study Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Masked Study to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Shp640 (Pvp-Iodine 0.6% and Dexamethasone 0.1%) Ophthalmic Suspension in the Treatment of Adenoviral Conjunctivitis

Research payments

$111,162

21 payments

Through program year 2020, $111,162 in research payments was reported against A Phase 3, Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Masked Study to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Shp640 (Pvp-Iodine 0.6% and Dexamethasone 0.1%) Ophthalmic Suspension in the Treatment of Adenoviral Conjunctivitis, across 21 payments, paid by Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc..

Paid by
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 Research $111,162 21

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2020
  1. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $111,162 21 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2020
  1. Bruce Segal Organisation paid for research $40,575 1 payment
  2. Connecticut Eye Consultants Pc Organisation paid for research $8,637 1 payment
  3. Medical University of South Carolina Organisation paid for research $8,500 1 payment
  4. Kentucky Pediatric Research INC Organisation paid for research $7,498 1 payment
  5. Frank Bowden Ophthalmology · Jacksonville, FL $6,702 1 payment
  6. Shettle Eye Research Incorporated Organisation paid for research $6,145 1 payment
  7. Florida International Research Center Organisation paid for research $5,124 1 payment
  8. Olympus Management Group Organisation paid for research $3,865 1 payment
  9. Washington University Organisation paid for research $3,646 2 payments
  10. Ohio State University Research Compliance Organisation paid for research $3,533 1 payment

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Records

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record