Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

A Phase 2, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Eff

Research payments

$7,851,881

895 payments

Through program year 2025, $7,851,881 in research payments was reported against A Phase 2, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Eff, across 895 payments, paid by GlaxoSmithKline, LLC..

Paid by
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $39,332 14
2024 Research $574,899 142
2023 Research $403,132 135
2022 Research $1,178,847 289
2021 Research $1,721,682 126
2020 Research $3,933,989 189

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $7,851,881 895 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2020–2025
  1. Univ Of Washington Organisation paid for research $1,206,589 14 payments
  2. Providence Health System-Southern California Organisation paid for research $756,861 37 payments
  3. Sarah Cannon Research Institute LLC Organisation paid for research $739,142 113 payments
  4. Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Hospital Organisation paid for research $583,615 55 payments
  5. The Regents Of The Univ Of Ca Organisation paid for research $448,743 36 payments
  6. The Curators Of The University Of Missouri Organisation paid for research $425,750 13 payments
  7. University Of Rochester Organisation paid for research $385,224 33 payments
  8. Allegheny-Singer Research Institute Organisation paid for research $380,776 11 payments
  9. Ohiohealth Research Institute Organisation paid for research $326,582 31 payments
  10. Allegheny Singer Research Institute Organisation paid for research $287,554 63 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

7 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record