Research study Program year 2025 Source: CMS Open Payments

A Phase 2 Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of AMG 133 in Adult Subjects With Overweight or Obesity, With or Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Research payments

$1,754,340

40 payments

Through program year 2025, $1,754,340 in research payments was reported against A Phase 2 Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of AMG 133 in Adult Subjects With Overweight or Obesity, With or Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, across 40 payments, paid by Amgen Inc..

Paid by
Amgen Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2025 Research $1,754,340 40

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2025
  1. Amgen Inc. $1,754,340 40 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2025
  1. Interspond Llc Organisation paid for research $339,033 4 payments
  2. Progressive Medical Concepts LLC Organisation paid for research $244,908 1 payment
  3. Avacare Foothills Research Center Organisation paid for research $137,289 1 payment
  4. Cognitive Clinical Trials LLC Organisation paid for research $111,663 2 payments
  5. Tandem Clinical Research - Marrero Organisation paid for research $97,006 1 payment
  6. Diablo Clinical Research Inc. Organisation paid for research $94,430 1 payment
  7. Louisville Metabolic And Atherosclerosis Research Center Organisation paid for research $84,430 1 payment
  8. Ark Clinical Research- Long Beach Organisation paid for research $54,595 2 payments
  9. Memorial Research Medical Clinic DBA Orange County Research Center Organisation paid for research $54,362 1 payment
  10. Memorial Research Medical Clinic Organisation paid for research $51,106 1 payment

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record