Research study Program year 2024 Source: CMS Open Payments

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Prospective, Double-masked, Parallel Study of EYP-1901, a Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI), Compared to Sham for the Improvement of Moderately Severe to Severe Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR)

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05383209

Research payments

$2,347,749

70 payments

Through program year 2024, $2,347,749 in research payments was reported against A Phase 2, Multicenter, Prospective, Double-masked, Parallel Study of EYP-1901, a Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI), Compared to Sham for the Improvement of Moderately Severe to Severe Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR), across 70 payments, paid by EyePoint Pharmaceuticals US, Inc..

Paid by
EyePoint Pharmaceuticals US, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT05383209

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2024 Research $904,927 34
2023 Research $1,339,469 31
2022 Research $103,354 5

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2022–2024
  1. EyePoint Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. $2,347,749 70 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2022–2024
  1. Vitreo Retinal Medical Group INC Organisation paid for research $251,261 4 payments
  2. Envision Ocular LLC Organisation paid for research $153,615 2 payments
  3. Cumberland Valley Retina Consultants Pc Organisation paid for research $141,413 2 payments
  4. Salehi Retina Institute INC Organisation paid for research $129,609 2 payments
  5. Austin Retina Associates Organisation paid for research $125,835 2 payments
  6. Connecticut Eye Consultants Pc Organisation paid for research $101,661 2 payments
  7. Blue Ocean Clinical Research Center LLC Organisation paid for research $98,780 3 payments
  8. Retina Associates LLC Organisation paid for research $83,894 1 payment
  9. Medeye Associates Organisation paid for research $78,828 2 payments
  10. Retina Associates, PA Organisation paid for research $76,288 1 payment

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2024

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record