Research study Program year 2021 Source: CMS Open Payments

A Phase 2 Exploratory Study of Intravenous Quzyttir (Cetirizine HCl Injection) Versus IV Diphenhydramine in the Prevention of Hypersesitivity Infusion Reactions

Research payments

$299,054

41 payments

Through program year 2021, $299,054 in research payments was reported against A Phase 2 Exploratory Study of Intravenous Quzyttir (Cetirizine HCl Injection) Versus IV Diphenhydramine in the Prevention of Hypersesitivity Infusion Reactions, across 41 payments, paid by TerSera Therapeutics LLC.

Paid by
TerSera Therapeutics LLC
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2021 Research $149,917 14
2020 Research $149,137 27

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2020–2021
  1. TerSera Therapeutics LLC $299,054 41 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2020–2021
  1. Oncology Consultants Organisation paid for research $110,801 3 payments
  2. Eisenhower Medical Center Teaching hospital · CA $53,961 13 payments
  3. St Joseph Health - Santa Rosa Organisation paid for research $44,725 7 payments
  4. Baylor Scott & White Organisation paid for research $29,140 5 payments
  5. St Joseph Health - Napa Organisation paid for research $19,338 3 payments
  6. Scott And White Memorial Hospital Teaching hospital · TX $17,633 4 payments
  7. St. Joseph Heritage Health - Napa Organisation paid for research $13,456 4 payments
  8. Dent Neurologic Institute Organisation paid for research $10,000 2 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

5 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record