Research study Program year 2021 Source: CMS Open Payments

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Maintenance and Long-Term Extension Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib (ABT-494) in Subjects with Crohns Disease who Completed the Studies M14-431 or M14-433

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03345823

Research payments

$2,186,661

519 payments

Through program year 2021, $2,186,661 in research payments was reported against A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Maintenance and Long-Term Extension Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib (ABT-494) in Subjects with Crohns Disease who Completed the Studies M14-431 or M14-433, across 519 payments, paid by AbbVie, Inc..

Paid by
AbbVie, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03345823

By program year

1 row
Year Kind Amount Payments
2021 Research $2,186,661 519

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program year 2021
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,186,661 519 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program year 2021
  1. Mount Sinai School Of Medicine Organisation paid for research $361,521 19 payments
  2. Tyler Research Institute LLC Organisation paid for research $251,439 14 payments
  3. University Of Washington Med Ctr Teaching hospital · WA $128,115 9 payments
  4. Mayo Clinic Health System Organisation paid for research $103,604 13 payments
  5. Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason Organisation paid for research $68,410 9 payments
  6. Quality Clinical Research Organisation paid for research $57,422 20 payments
  7. East View Medical Research LLC Organisation paid for research $57,020 16 payments
  8. Hospital Of The Univ Of Penna Teaching hospital · PA $56,203 12 payments
  9. Regents Of The University Of California Organisation paid for research $52,397 8 payments
  10. Cb Flock Research Corporation Organisation paid for research $51,927 13 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2021

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record