Research study Program year 2020 Source: CMS Open Payments

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Study With an Open-Label Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fremanezumab for the Prophylactic Treatment of Migraine in Patients With Inadequate Response to Prior Preventive Treatments

Research payments

$507,726

168 payments

Through program year 2020, $507,726 in research payments was reported against A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Study With an Open-Label Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fremanezumab for the Prophylactic Treatment of Migraine in Patients With Inadequate Response to Prior Preventive Treatments, across 168 payments, paid by Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc..

Paid by
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov
No trial number was reported for this study

By program year

2 rows
Year Kind Amount Payments
2020 Research $11,991 6
2019 Research $495,735 162

Breakdown

Who paid Research payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $507,726 168 payments
Who received the money Research payments · program years 2019–2020
  1. Medvadis Research Corporation Organisation paid for research $111,258 9 payments
  2. Dent Neurosciences Research Organisation paid for research $87,878 8 payments
  3. David Kudrow Neurology · Santa Monica, CA $43,804 7 payments
  4. Ki Health Partners LLC Organisation paid for research $35,522 12 payments
  5. Clinical Research Institute Organisation paid for research $23,352 9 payments
  6. Lewis Brandes AG Organisation paid for research $23,133 8 payments
  7. Future Search Trials Of Neurology Organisation paid for research $22,698 10 payments
  8. Albuquerque Clinical Trials Organisation paid for research $17,450 14 payments
  9. Baptist Health Center for Clinical Research Organisation paid for research $15,704 10 payments
  10. Artemis Institute For Clinical Research Organisation paid for research $15,392 7 payments

Usually the institution or organisation running the study, not a person.

Every payment, record by record

Date, amount, who was paid and what for — filter by year and kind, or download as CSV, free, in files of 5,000 rows.

Principal investigators named

10 shown

Named on the study's payments. Being named is not being paid: the money in the figures above went to the recipients listed, not necessarily to these people.

What you are looking at

Research payments are tied to a study. Being named on a study as a principal investigator is reported separately from being paid as a recipient, and the two are not the same thing — a named investigator has not necessarily received the money.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2020

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record